NEWS FLASH CANDIDATE SHARON ANDERSON AND BILL DAHN ARE SUING THE STATE CANVASS BOARD. RE: ORIGINAL JURISTICTION WITH JUSTICE LORI GILDEA AS JUSTICE AND DEFENDANT.
JUDGE YE THAT WE SHALL NOT JUDGE.
Mon.16Aug2010
A06-1150(R.Anderson)_A09-2031(Toussaint) C8-84-241(Huspeni)
County, Appellant.
A10-395 KSTP-TV, et al., Respondents, vs. Ramsey County, Appellant.
Ramsey County District Court, Hon. Judge Dale B. Lindman.
Because Minn. Stat. § 13.37, subd. 2 (2008), unambiguously provides that sealed absentee ballots are nonpublic or private data until opened by an election judge, rejected absentee ballots that have never been opened by an election judge are nonpublic or private data.
Reversed. Judge Heidi S. Schellhas.
Ramsey County District Court, Hon. Judge Dale B. Lindman.62-CV-09-9240_
Sharons Files 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) 62cv10-110 (Lindman)
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES MS204C_MN CONST.ART.III SEPARATION OF POWERS
Secretary of State Ritchie to convene State Canvassing Board Tuesday
The Minnesota Constitution requires that the secretary of state call to his ... of the Minnesota Supreme Court and two judges of the district court to canvass the ... Minnesota Statutes 204C.32 requires the board meet on the seventh day ...
www.hometownsource.com/index.php?...canvassing-board...County canvassing boards, 204C.32, 204C.33, 204C.37 to 204C.39 State Canvassing Board, 204C.33, 204C.38, 208.05Anderson
www.hometownsource.com/index.php?...canvassing-board...County canvassing boards, 204C.32, 204C.33, 204C.37 to 204C.39 State Canvassing Board, 204C.33, 204C.38, 208.05Anderson
Go to www.taxthemax.blogspot.com On the Graves of our Heritage Sharon is Married to Minnesota till Death do us Part , Challenging the StateCanvass Board, citing Judge Gregg Johnson and his Lawyer Wife SusanHaigh 4 Major Fraud, Conspiracy to committ Murder via Unpublished Opinions Share
The county canvassing board shall meet at the county auditor's office on or before the third day following the state primary. After taking the oath of office,
"I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States, the constitution and the laws of the state of Minnesota and the policies of _Rule of Law,Canvass Boards __________ School District (ESD or Community College). During my term, I will faithfully and impartially discharge the responsibilities of the office to the best of my ability."
Minnesota Supreme Court
Quo Warranto_Electronic Petition 4 Writ Prohibition
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE ELECTRONICALLY 4:28PM MON.16AUG2010
Constitutionality MS204.xx Judges_Lawyers on any Canvass Boards.
http://electionresults.sos.state.mn.us/20100810/
STATE OF MINNESOTA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
In the matter of the Aug.10th 2010
Primary,to be filled 2Nov2010
87County_State Canvass Boards and
State of Minnesota,
Candidates Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella aka Peterson and
Bill Dahn 4 MNAG
Plaintiffs_ QuiTam_Relators_ IFP_Candidates 4 MNAG
vs.
and
Ramsey Co.Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota and
Canvass Board(1) Mark Oswald Dir. Elections/taxes (2) Larry Dease 2nd Judicial Court Administrator (3) Mayor Chris Coleman designee Shari Moore St.Paul City Clerk (4)Ramsey Co Victoria Reinhardt aka Mrs.Barone(DFL)AssitAG(5)Tony Bennet Co.Board. Individually,severally, official capacity,Oath of Office, John Doe and Mary Roe,
Defendants_ Relatees
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
COUNT I MN CONSTITUTION ART III
Minnesota State Constitution Image Map Navigation Banner. ARTICLE I ... 3. LIBERTY OF THE PRESS. The liberty of the press shall forever remain inviolate, ...
www.house.leg.state.mn.us/cco/rules/mncon/Article1.htm - Cached
www.house.leg.state.mn.us/cco/rules/mncon/Article1.htm - Cached
COUNT I I MS 204.xxx
"Separation of powers serves several goals. Separation prevents concentration of power (seen as the root of tyranny) and provides each branch with weapons to fight off encroachment by the other two branches. As James Madison argued in the Federalist Papers (No. 51), "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." Clearly, our system of separated powers is not designed to maximize efficiency; it is designed to maximize freedom."
Cases, notes, questions, and images relating to the separation of the powers.
www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/.../separationofpowers.htm - Cached - Similar Constitutionality of MS204B.06 sub8 exempting Judges,Co.Attrys,Sheriffs from Disclosure.
www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/.../separationofpowers.htm - Cached - Similar Constitutionality of MS204B.06 sub8 exempting Judges,Co.Attrys,Sheriffs from Disclosure.
a. Is MS204.xx Unconstitutionally Vague, at War with MN Const. Art. III Separation of PowersJudicial Encroachment on Legislative Powers
Mistretta v U. S. (1989) Canvass Boards are in the Executive Branch.
Mistretta v U. S. (1989) Canvass Boards are in the Executive Branch.
Therefore: MN Chief Justice cannot and must not violate her OATH to uphold the State and Federal Constitutions, Therefore her membership on the State Canvass Board, must Void the Canvass
to be heard tomorrow Tues 17Aug2010.
"The Constitution limits his functions in the lawmaking process to the recommending of laws he thinks wise and the vetoing of laws he thinks bad. And the Constitution is neither silent nor equivocal about who shall make laws which the President is to execute. The first section of the first article says that "All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States . . . ."
COUNT III
Has Fundamental Rule of Law, Have the Courts "Denied" "due process" for their unjust Enrichment, exploiting the Citizens of the State of MInnesota YES
COUNT IV
Obama Supports Sharia Law and Constitutional Change In ...
Jun 14, 2010 ... (February 2008) From my January 11 post: Obama backed sharia advocate Odinga ... Kenyan law stipulates separation of church and state, ...
atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/.../obama-supports-sharia-law-in-kenya.html - Cached Separation Church and State ie: ShariahLaw
atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/.../obama-supports-sharia-law-in-kenya.html - Cached Separation Church and State ie: ShariahLaw
THEREFORE: MN CHIEF JUSTICE LORIE GILDEA MUST OBEY HER OATH OF OFFICE: REMOVE HERSELF FROM THE CANVASS BOARD TO CERTIFY THE 2010 PRIMARY ELECTIONS__________
Rule that MS204.xx is Unconstituionally vague,arbitrary, completely at WAR with MN Const. Art. III Separation of Powers Doctrine.
Set a Date for Motions before Justice Gildea
MEMNORANDUMN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=MN+Supreme+Court+Original+Jurisdiction+&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=MN+Supreme+Court+Original+Jurisdiction+&gs_rfai=CxMAUb6xpTNzTOI-GNP3ryNMGAAAAqgQFT9DghXQ&fp=6a14a66f69c6338
150,000 results
Search Results
The Northwestern reporter - Google Books Result
Iowa. Supreme Court, Michigan. Supreme Court, Minnesota. Supreme Court - 1922 - Law
The statute provided : "The Supreme Court has power in the exercise of its original jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, ...
books.google.com/books?id=aA08AAAAIAAJ...Minnesota State Law Library - Minnesota Court of Appeals Standards ...
- 5 visits - 9/14/09- [PDF]
1 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A09-382 Original ...
- 4:23pmFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Aug 5, 2010 ... STATE OF MINNESOTA. IN SUPREME COURT. A09-382. Original Jurisdiction. Per Curiam. Took no part, Stras, J. In re Petition for Disciplinary ...
www.mncourts.gov/opinions/sc/current/OPA090382-0805.pdf United States Code: Title 28,1251. Original jurisdiction LII ...
- 4:23pmMinnesota Constitution: Article VI
Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Minnesota Office of the Secretary of State : Minnesota Supreme Court
Jun 1, 2009 ... Jurisdiction: The Minnesota constitution provides that the supreme court shall have original jurisdiction in such remedial cases as are ...
www.sos.state.mn.us › ... › Chapter 5 State Judiciary - Cached - Similar
536F.2d 1207 Rev.Sharon Scarrella v. Midwest Fed S&L No 75-1912 8th Cir.
State of Minnesota, by and through NOTICE OF MOTIONS
AND MOTIONS
MS609.43_MS609.456_MS609 42USC3631
Plaintiff-Complaintant
Sharon(Scarrella)Anderson, QuiTam Relator Contestant
vs.
MN Sec. State Mark Ritchie et al + 87 County Canvass Boards
| ATTORNEY GENERAL | |||||
| Candidate Name | Party | Website | File Date | ||
| BILL DAHN | Independence | http://www.billdahn.com/
| 6/1/2010 | ||
| SHARON ANDERSON | Republican | http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/
| 5/19/2010 | ||
| CHRIS BARDEN | Republican | http://www.barden4ag.com/
| 5/25/2010 | ||
| LEO F. MEYER | Democratic-Farmer-Labor |
| 6/1/2010 | ||
| LORI SWANSON | Democratic-Farmer-Labor | http://www.loriswanson.com/
| 5/20/2010 | ||
| DAVID J. HOCH | The Resource Party | ||||
Personal Capacitys and
Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner, John Choi, Joseph Mansky, Elections Clerk, Lynae Olson,Clerk Ramsey Co. District Court,Larry Dease 2nd Judicial Court Administrator
Mark Oswald Tax/Election Clerk,Trudy Moloney,Victoria Reinhardt,Tony Bennet,
RICO Co-Conspirators Defendants
Corrupt Practices Act
Comes now Qui-Tam contestant's Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella and Bill Dahn non lawyers 4 Minnesota Attorney General pursuant to Civil Rights Voting Act MN Constitution Art. III Separation of Powers, Minnesota Office of the Secretary of State : Chapter 200
May 3, 2010 ... The statutory canons of construction applicable to general elections, ..... A person should not be deprived of his right to vote in a ... the petition to only those individuals who were eligible to cast ... 4. Application of chapter 14. Proceedings under this section are not subject to chapter 14. ...
www.sos.state.mn.us › ... › Election Law › Minnesota Statutes & Rules - Cached
www.sos.state.mn.us › ... › Election Law › Minnesota Statutes & Rules - Cached
Civil Rights, 1964-1968
Voting Rights Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Final page of the Voting Rights Act, signed by President Johnson, ... Strickland that the Voting Rights Act does not require governments to draw district ..... Open Housing Movement · Civil Rights Act of 1964 · Civil Rights Act of 1968 ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act
Abolish Property Taxes - taxthemax.blogspot.com/
Armed Forces Members - Minnesota Legislature - Office of the ...
MinnLawyer Blog » Blog Archive » 8th Circuit strikes down judicial ...
- 2 visits - Aug 9Jul 29, 2010 ... I will do everything I can to protect the right to vote. ... by Judicial Tryanny without Royalitys to circumvent MN Const. Art. III Separation of Powers, Voting Rights Act Eligible to Vote then and therefore Eligible for ...
minnlawyer.com/.../8th-circuit-strikes-down-judicial-campaign-restriction
minnlawyer.com/.../8th-circuit-strikes-down-judicial-campaign-restriction
Legal Notice to Ramsey and Washington County Canvass Boards and their Members Request to trigger investigations by Candidates SharonAnderson4MNAG http://www.sharonmnag2010.blogspot.com/ http://www.billdahn.com/ also byR_Endorsed Candidate Chris Barden 4 MNAG for http://www.barden4ag.com/Consumer Protection in the Canvass Boards 10Aug10 Primary to2Nov10 General Elections and Dan McGrath http://www.mnmajority.org/LEGAL NOTICE TO CHALLENGE 87 COUNTY CANVASS BOARDS AND 87 COUNTY ATTORNEYS http://www.mnccc.org/ http://www.manatron.com/ Election Integrity unabated by Ramsey Co. Attorney Susan Gaertner.
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 http://www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com/Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act of 1862 neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack Sharon4Anderson Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger: Dashboard Home www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson http://www.taxthemax.blogspot.com/ www.sharon4anderson.org
FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities, employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw SharonsWritProA06_1150_30Jun06_26
The CAN-SPAM Act: Requirements for Commercial Emailers
Sharons-Psychic-Whispers: Sharons Gypsy Curse-Court-Cop Corruption 3Apr0http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPlawsuit/courtfilings/Docket.htm Sharon4Council: DLJ Management v. City St. Paul A06-2118,Money LaunderinNo direct un-apportioned tax confirmed by the US Supreme Court rulings in CHAS. C. STEWARD MACH. CO. v. DAVIS, 301 U.S. 548, 581-582(1937) g andFCC Complaints - http://sharons-copywrite.blogspot.com/
Sure is Strange that you only mention the AG’s Race ie Sharon Anderson 4 Judicial Reform,Separation of Powers,FreeSpeeh_Press,Constitutional Guarantees
Sharon is calling for the Resignation of any “Lawyers” from the Executive,Legislative Branch’s ,violating the Separation of Powers ie: In re: Scarrella4Justice221NW2d http://www.sharon4judge.blogspot.com then the Trial Lawyer “Emmers” acting in concort with “Obama” simulating Legal Process via “Oaths of Office.
Judicial Reforms Needed by JOn Roland NonLawyer for Texas AG http://www.constitution.org
In response to requests to summarize the most important judicial reforms needed, here is a list of some of the most important, with links to further discussion.
Select judges into a pool of judges by sortition, or at random, not by election or appointment, but with some filtering for knowledge and skills.
Assign judges to courts for short terms by sortition. Even members of the Supreme Court would be drawn at random from the general pool of judges.
Have multiple judges assigned to each court, and assign them to cases by sortition.
Expand supreme and other appellate courts to 28 members, and hear cases initially by randomly selected panels of three, appealable to randomly selected panels of nine, and appealable from there to randomly selected panels of 27 (with one spare).
Require that decisions of multi-judge panels be unanimous to sustain a claimed power of government against a claim by a citizen that the government lacks such power.
Mandate reversal of any judgment that does not presume nonauthority for any official act and require strict proof of such authority.
Mandate reversal of any judgment for the prosecution in a trial with mixed issues of law and fact, including all criminal trials, in which parties have been impeded from arguing all issues of law before the jury, except those issues that may not be argued without disclosing evidence properly excluded.
Forbid motions in limine to the prosecution in criminal trials.
Mandate reversal of the conviction in any criminal trial in which the jury has not been instructed to determine whether the charge is authorized by applicable statutes and constitutions, or they have not been provided with copies of such statutes and constitutions, and of legal pleadings on the arguments in the case.
Mandate the suspension, without pay, on the first offense, for one month, of any judge who, having jurisdiction, fails to schedule a hearing on a prerogative writ of quo warranto, habeas corpus, procedendo, mandamus, prohibito, scire facias, or certiorari, within 3 days of it being filed and served on respondant, or to hold a hearing thereon within 20 days, in which the burden of proof shall be on the respondant, failing which judgment shall be rendered in favor of the demandant. The suspension shall be doubled for each subsequent failure.
Mandate the convening of a grand jury of 23 by random selection from each jurisdiction having a population of no more than 3000 persons (village).
Mandate that no more than half the time of the grand jury be spent hearing bills of indictment, and that they shall have at least 4 hours to consider each bill, unless they shall choose otherwise.
Authorize grand juries to issue subpoenas directly rather than only through their courts.
Authorize and direct grand juries to decide the jurisdiction, or lack thereof, or the immunity of any official, for any complaint brought before them.
Authorize grand juries to order the removal of any impediments to access to them by members of the public
Authorize grand juries to issue to any complainant or his designee, not just to public prosecutors, an indictment authorizing criminal prosecution.
Authorize grand juries to investigate any public or private enterprise whose activities may adversely impact the public, and to report their findings.
Mandate that trial and grand juries be convened under the supervision of prior grand juries to insure there is no stacking.
Mandate the reversal of any court decision which treats a recent precedent as binding, and for constitutional issues does not return to the original text and historical evidence of its meaning.
Mandate reversal of any denial of standing of a party to privately prosecute a public right for injunctive or declaratory relief, or on a writ of quo warranto.
Mandate reversal of any disablement or deprivation of life, limb, liberty for more than 24 hours, property, or parental rights without a trial by a jury of 12, including for contempt of court.
Mandate reversal of any restriction on the practice of law without a jury trial.
Mandate reversal of any court decision in which the public was not allowed to record the proceedings, other than to conceal the identities of the jury.
Mandate reversal of any court decision in which the judges do not justify and publish their decision, clearly separating it from summary, findings, and dicta.
This list is subject to revision, so check back from time to time for the latest.
Many of these reforms would now require a constitutional amendment to overcome long chains of precedent. Such amendments are to be found here.
–
Unless you work in law enforcement
Radley Balko August 2, 2010
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. That’s the standard line motorists hear when they say they weren’t aware of the speed limit, or gun owners hear when they say didn’t know about the gun laws in the jurisdiction they happened to get arrested in. Yet that ignorance is pretty understandable in an America where just about everything is being criminalized. At the federal level alone there are now more than 4,500 separate crimes, and that’s not counting the massive regulatory code, violations of which also can sometimes be punished with criminal charges.